ILS Committee Minutes
October 4, 2023
10:00 am
SCLS Headquarters
1650 Pankratz Street
Madison, WI 53704
Hybrid Meeting = in person and using virtual Zoom option
Action
Items:
·
The IC approved the recommendation from the Circulation Services
Subcommittee to create a Patron Holds History Retention Policy.
·
The IC approved the recommendation from the Collection Maintenance
Subcommittee to change the Levels of Cataloging Policy to add Mobile Hotspots
to the PERM section.
·
The IC approved the ILS Third Party Products Review plan.
·
The IC approved the ILS and Discovery Layer Evaluation for 2024.
Present: Erin Foley, ACL (1), Amanda Wakeman, COL (2),
Suzann Holland, MRO (3), Eddie Glade, PCPL (4), Lauren White, PDS (5),
Katherine Elchert, MCM (6), Kate Hull, SUN (7), Phil
Hansen, FCH (8), Nate Snortum, DCL (9, 10), Margie
Navarre Saaf, Molly Warren, Susan Lee, MAD (11 -13)
Absent:
None
Excused: None
Recorder: Michelle Karls
(SCLS)
SCLS
Staff Present:
Vicki Teal Lovely, Amy Gannaway, Heidi Oliversen, Martha Van Pelt
1. Call to Order at 10:01 am.
a.
Introduction of guests/visitors
i.
Amanda Wakeman (COL)
is a proxy today for Debbie Bird (POR) representing Cluster 2.
b.
Changes/Additions to the Agenda
i.
None.
c.
Requests to address the Committee
i.
None.
2. Approval of previous meeting
minutes:
August 2, 2023
a.
Motion: M. Navarre Saaf
moved approval of the August meeting minutes. N. Snortum
seconded.
b.
Discussion: none.
c.
Vote: motion carried.
3. Action Items
a.
Recommendation from CSS:
Patron Hold History retention policy.
i.
A patron’s Hold History will display in the patron’s
Discovery Layer Dashboard for a period of 30 days after each hold is issued to
the patron, expired on the hold shelf, or is cancelled.
ii.
A patrons’ Hold History will display in the patron’s
record, Hold History tab, for Library staff for a period of 90 days after each
hold is issued to the patron, expired on the hold shelf, or is cancelled.
iii.
System settings that clear information are based on
these ranges and can only be changed by an agreement from LINKcat Directors.
1. Motion:
This motion came from Circulation Services Subcommittee.
2. Discussion:
H. Oliversen reviewed the policy. It describes a current practice that has been
in place since Koha. We just wanted to
make these parameters official policy.
3. Vote:
motion carried.
b. Recommendation
from CMS:
i.
The subcommittee recommends changing the
Levels of Cataloging Policy to add Mobile Hotspots to the PERM section.
1.
Motion: This motion came from Collection
Maintenance Subcommittee.
2.
Discussion: A. Gannaway
reviewed the recommendation.
3.
Vote: motion carried.
c.
Approve ILS Third Party Products Review plan
i.
Motion: K. Hull moved approval of the ILS
Third Party Products review plan. M.
Warren seconded.
ii.
Discussion:
V. Teal Lovely reviewed the plan that was first presented at the August meeting. Our goal is to have a uniform review. V. Teal Lovely reviewed the current product
list. The ILS Evaluation process can
take up to 3 years including implementation for new software.
iii.
Vote: motion carried.
d.
Approve ILS and Discovery Layer Evaluation for
2024
i.
Motion: M. Warren moved approval of the ILS
and Discovery Layer Evaluation for 2024.
P. Hartman seconded.
ii.
Discussion: V. Teal Lovely reviewed the idea
of evaluation plan with the group. We can
use the 2017/2018 evaluation as a guide for the next process. SUN has heard mixed responses to the
evaluation from their cluster. A few people
in the cluster were excited about the Discovery Layer being looked at. A few others were interested but had
questions. Is the other software we’re
looking at fully web-based? Why is it
necessary for it to be cloud-hosted?
Some of these questions came from directors who are newer to SCLS and weren’t
here for the last evaluation. Cloud-hosted
software is desirable because it means we don’t have to have servers on-site. Server maintenance is costly and can include
a lot more staff time. Fully web-based software
means that it is accessible from nearly anywhere and it was a high priority in
the last evaluation. Prior evaluations indicated that the other products
web-based offerings were not fully functional. After reviewing software at ALA
in July, we have reason to believe some vendors web-based versions are farther
along. V. Teal Lovely did receive an
email with concerns about the cost of moving to another software. Cost will be a major consideration and is
typically one of the last factors considered in the evaluation process. Our
last evaluation was done with in person demos from vendors. This may have changed since the pandemic and
they may prefer to do online demos.
iii.
Vote: motion carried.
4. Reports
a.
ILS Report
i.
V. Teal Lovely reviewed the August and
September ILS Reports.
b.
Circulation Services Subcommittee
i.
H. Oliversen reviewed
the September meeting minutes.
c.
Collection Maintenance Subcommittee
i.
A. Gannaway reviewed
the September meeting minutes.
d.
Discovery Interface Subcommittee
i.
A. Gannaway reviewed
the September meeting minutes.
5. Items from clusters for initial
discussion
a.
None.
6. Requests for New Service
a.
None.
7. Discussion
a. Discussion: Review 2024 draft Technology Plan: ILS section
i.
V.
Teal Lovely sent this draft to the group via email
because we didn’t want to post sensitive material on the web site (want to talk
about cybersecurity, but don’t want it posted for anyone to see). We are being extra careful. V. Teal Lovely reviewed the 2024 draft Technology
Plan: ILS Section. This was presented at
the last meeting. A lot of the plan
stays the same year to year. This is
incorporated into our five-year plan structure.
If it doesn’t say “new”, it’s a carryover from a previous year. OverDrive is taking
longer than expected. New for 2024, is
ILS/DL marketplace evaluation.
Everything else pertains to Technology.
We do plan to move the Technology web site behind a secure login. We will be voting on approving this at the
December meeting.
b. Discussion: Review draft 2024 Meeting Calendar
i.
V.
Teal Lovely reviewed the draft. We will
be approving this at the December meeting.
c.
Discussion: Prepare for the fall ILS Users’
Summit
i.
V. Teal Lovely reviewed the agenda for the ILS
Summit. We will go over the plan for the
software review. Tim Drexler will also
be sharing some reports and database information with the group.
8.
Plan
for Next meeting: December 6, 2023 at 10 am at SCLS
Headquarters or via phone/video conference
a. Action: Approve 2024 Technology Plan: ILS section
b. Action: Approve 2024 Meeting Calendar
c. Action: Approve 2024 Bibliovation
Development Plan. This will not happen because of the upcoming ILS
Evaluation.
9.
Adjournment
at 10:41 am
For more information about the ILS
Committee, contact Vicki Teal Lovely.
SCLS
staff are available to attend cluster meetings to share information and answer
questions pertaining to this committee meeting and other departmental projects.
ILS Committee/Minutes/10-2023